Part 10
—Classification and Assessment—Agricultural, Forest and Open Space Land
67-5-1001. Short title. — |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
Sections 11-14-201,
11-15-107,
11-15-108,
and this part shall be known and may be cited as the “Agricultural, Forest
and Open Space Land Act of 1976.” |
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
[Acts 1976, ch. 782, § 1; T.C.A., § 67-650.] |
||||
67-5-1002. Legislative findings. — |
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
The general assembly finds that: |
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
(1) The existence of much agricultural,
forest and open space land is threatened by pressure from urbanization,
scattered residential and commercial development, and the system of property
taxation. This pressure is the result of urban sprawl around urban and
metropolitan areas, which also brings about land use conflicts, creates
high costs for public services, contributes to increased energy usage, and
stimulates land speculation; |
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
(2) The preservation of open space in or
near urban areas contributes to: |
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
(A) The use,
enjoyment and economic value of surrounding residential, commercial,
industrial or public use lands; |
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
(B) The conservation
of natural resources, water, air, and wildlife; |
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
(C) The planning and
preservation of land in an open condition for the general welfare; |
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
(D) A relief from the
monotony of continued urban sprawl; and |
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
(E) An opportunity
for the study and enjoyment of natural areas by urban and suburban residents
who might not otherwise have access to such amenities; |
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
(3) Many prime agricultural and forest
lands in Tennessee, valuable for producing food and fiber for a hungry world,
are being permanently lost for any agricultural purposes and that these lands
constitute important economic, physical, social, and esthetic assets to the
surrounding lands and to the people of Tennessee; |
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
(4) Many landowners are being forced by
economic pressures to sell such agricultural, forest, or open space land for
premature development by the imposition of taxes based, not on the value of
the land in its current use, but on its potential for conversion to another
use; and |
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
(5) The findings of subdivisions (1)-(4)
must be tempered by the fact that in rural counties an over abundance of land
held by a single landowner that is classified on the tax rolls by the
provisions of this part could have an adverse effect upon the ad valorem tax
base of the county, and thereby disrupt needed services provided by the county.
To this end, a limit must be placed upon the number of acres that any one (1)
owner within a tax jurisdiction can bring within the provisions of this part. |
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
[Acts 1976, ch. 782, § 2; T.C.A., § 67-651; Acts 1984, ch. 685, § 1.] |
||||
67-5-1003. Policy of state. — |
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
The general assembly declares that it is the policy of this state that: |
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
(1) The owners of existing open space
should have the opportunity for themselves, their heirs and assigns to
preserve such land in its existing open condition, if it is their desire to
do so, and if any or all of the benefits enumerated in § 67-5-1002
would accrue to the public thereby, and that the taxing or zoning powers of
governmental entities in Tennessee should not be used to force unwise,
unplanned or premature development of such land; |
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
(2) The preservation of open space is a
public purpose necessary for sound, healthful, and well-planned urban
development, that the economic development of urban and suburban areas can be
enhanced by the preservation of such open space, and that public funds may be
expended by the state or any municipality or county in the state for the purpose
of preserving existing open space for one (1) or more of the reasons
enumerated in this section; and |
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
||
|
||||
|
(3) No person may place more than one
thousand five hundred (1,500) acres of land within any one (1) taxing
jurisdiction under the provisions of this part. For purposes of this maximum
limit, ownership shall be attributed among multiple owners as follows: a
person shall be deemed to have placed under the provisions of this part that
percentage of the total acreage of any parcel classified under this part that
equals the percentage of such person's ownership interest in such parcel. If
a parcel classified under this part is owned by a trust, partnership,
corporation or other artificial entity, a person shall be deemed to have
placed under this part that percentage of the total acreage of the parcel
that equals the person's percentage interest in the ownership or net earnings
of the entity. Further, a parcel owned by an artificial entity shall be aggregated
with parcels owned by other artificial entities having fifty percent (50%) or
more common ownership or control, and together the parcels may not exceed the
maximum acreage provided in this section. To the extent that a parcel of
property is owned by a person who is disqualified under this subdivision (3),
such property or portion thereof in which such person owns an interest shall
be ineligible for classification under this part. If property is disqualified
for use value classification solely as the result of these ownership
attribution provisions, any rollback assessment due shall be limited to tax
savings accruing after April 14, 1992. The provisions of this subdivision (3)
shall not operate to apply the maximum acreage limitation to an agricultural
classification that the owner obtained prior to July 1, 1984. |
|
||
|
||||
|
||||
|
[Acts 1976, ch. 782, § 3; T.C.A., § 67-652; Acts 1984, ch. 685, § 2; 1992,
ch. 661, § 1; 2008, ch. 1161, § 1.] |